Comments Coar-Repositories

I’m really looking forward to see how Pubfair develops!
I have a small comment: here FAIR research outputs are mentioned, but it isn’t mentioned/explained in the paper what FAIR is. I think the paper may benefit from a small explanation.

Here I’m getting confused. Before Pubfare was defined as framework in the graph it as a platform. Is it the same is it different. (in the graph it is called PubFAIR everywhere else Pubfair.

Missing exampled for standards and protocolls. Many don’t means all -> what is missing, and how will information liked an edited new version will flow back to a repository.

“e.g., a” remove , ?

delete experts “technical experts experts convened”

Maybe hyperlink to the Next Generation Repository report?

Perhaps revisit “repositories has remains largely”

In my opinion the top layer ( dissemination layer ) should be connected to the bottom one (repository layer) since the object disseminated are those cointained in the repository, through their metadata. Perhaps a Circular schema could describe better your architecture.

Again. to have  High quality at low price is “the Graal”; please specify what you think it would be possible for you to get.

Please tell what do you intend as quality, and how can you guarantee it in your framework