¶ 1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 For these interactions to scale beyond a single system to system interaction and be adopted across a distributed network of repositories and peer review services, there is a need to define and adopt a controlled vocabulary that will standardise the requests and responses between the repository and overlay service.
¶ 2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 In the table below we provide some examples of notifications that will need standard vocabularies. These vocabularies will be defined in the next phase of development and implementation of this model.
|Author deposits article and chooses an overlay review service from a pre-existing list||Request for review|
|The overlay service acknowledges that the request for review has been received||Acknowledge request|
|Overlay service decides to accept article for review (or not)||Response to request for peer review|
|Article reviewed by reviewers||(Article stays in repository)|
|Peer reviews are complete author is notified of result||Response to decision about whether to publish article|
|When revisions requested, then new version of article uploaded to the repository||Repository informs overlay service that a new version is available for review|